|
XAT JANUARY 4, 2015
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
XAT or Xavier Aptitude Test is the
entrance exam organized by Xavier Labour Relation Institute (XLRI),
Jamshedpur. However, it is conducted by the Xavier Association of Management
Institutes (XAMI) for admission in XLRI and many other top tier management
institutes of India. It is considered to be one of the toughest MBA entrance
exams in India that calls for complete dedication and awareness.
Students might perceive with the concept of XAT being the toughest to crack but, experts who have been analyzing this examination for a long time now, claims that you do not need to be a mathematical genius or a literature pundit to crack this test. Rather, the real objective of the examiner's is to check the presence of mind, common sense and logical ability of the aspiring candidates and to cherry pick those who are promising enough and show tremendous potential. XAT scores are accepted by several prestigious MBA institutes like Xavier Institute of Management and Entrepreneurship - Bangalore, Xavier Institute of Management Bhubaneswar – Bhubaneswar, Xavier Institute of Social Service – Ranchi, XLRI Jamshedpur School of Management – Jamshedpur, Xavier Institute of Development Action and Studies – Jabalpur, Xavier Institute of Management & Research – Mumbai, S P Jain Institute of Management Research (SPJIMR) Mumbai, Loyola Institute of Business Administration (LIBA) Chennai, etc.
XAT 2015 will be conducted on 04th
January, 2015, Sunday and the registration for the same will start from 12th
August and ends on 22nd November, 2014. Detailed bulletin is available on http://www.xlri.ac.in/.
Exam Structure :
Quantitative Ability English Language & Logical Reasoning Decision Making GK and Essay XAT 2015 will be conducted in 47 cities across India and 2 International cities outside India
In XAT exams, unlike other MBA
entrance tests, candidates need to be more attentive in selecting which
question to solve and what to drop without wasting much time. This is an
important aspect of XAT examination as it throws more number of questions to
be solved in less time. In such a pressure building scenario, students need
not lose their nerve and solve easier looking questions before attempting
tough or complicated questions. However, selection of easier questions is
very difficult as they are very well inserted between the tougher questions
that are speed breakers in such competitive exams. But, it is not impossible
to master the skill of scrutinising questions and one could polish this skill
by regress practice and disciplined preparation.
For instance, one can easily find
simpler questions based upon algebra and trigonometry, between two questions
which might involve application of calculus. Though the questions based upon
calculus and functions are themselves on decline as observed in the past.
Thus, XAT primarily tests three skills in any aspiring student:
Analysis of XAT 2013 Paper
Pattern:
The first step for a focused XAT
preparation is to understand the XAT paper pattern. XAT sample and practice
papers, which are available at MBA Rendezvous, will help you figure how the
pattern of XAT 2014 will be. Also for your understanding, XAT 2013 paper has
been discussed in detail:
XAT
2013 – Analysis
XAT 2013 was characterized by
tough Verbal Ability and Decision Making Sections with the Quantitative
Ability and Data Interpretation Section being a lot more manageable as
compared to previous years. There were 91 questions in PART 1 all with all
questions carrying equal marks. Section Wise Analysis is as follows:
Part
I
SECTION A: VERBAL AND LOGICAL
ABILITY (30 questions)
This section was a bit tougher
than the earlier XAT papers, especially compared to last year’s paper. Also,
this section was time consuming. At least 10 out of 30 questions were
difficult. At least 5 were of a moderate level of difficulty. All the passages
were difficult to comprehend. Almost all RC questions were inferential. Many
options were framed ambiguously and in a tricky manner, with the obvious
answer not being available.
Reading Comprehension:
18 out of 30 questions were
reading comprehension based. There were 4 passages. The passages were about
concepts that were very advanced and esoteric for a graduate. They were
technical and contained a lot of jargon. No attempt was made to tailor the
content or language for a layperson. Except for 2-3 questions, all were
inferential. There were 3-4 further application based questions too.
Verbal Ability (including Verbal
Reasoning):
Grammar Based (6 questions): 3
questions required filling in multiple blanks. Two questions required filling
in articles and one required filling in prepositions. There was a misprint in
the last question that caused all the options to be incorrect. 3 questions
had an italicized part presented in five different ways. All the six
questions were very easy.
Reasoning Based (3 questions):
These were 3 questions based on a new question type. Test takers were
required to identify the relationship between the 2/3 statements given –
whether they were dependent or independent, deducible or inducible from one
another etc. Unfortunately, the terms (dependent/independent) were not
defined. All three of these were difficult.
Jumbled Paragraph (3 questions): 1
paragraph contained 5 sentences and two contained 4. These were very easy.
It was important to not get
intimidated, frustrated or loses patience. As XAT gave 140 minutes this time,
one could easily spend 45 minutes on English. 15 minutes were sufficient for
the 12 non-RC questions. In the remaining 30 minutes, one could solve 2
passages comfortably. The passages should have been selected as per one’s
comfort level with the topic and language. As most of the RC questions were
inferential, ‘question type’ would not play a role in selection of passages.
Ideally the first two passages should have been solved as they were shorter.
Here, it wouldn’t have been prudent to solve a few questions from each
passage after giving a cursory reading to the passage as the passages were
difficult and gradually built on the main idea. Also, the questions were
inferential.
SECTION B: DECISION MAKING (25
questions)
Decision making is always the
distinguishing element in XAT and the most subjective. There were 25
questions in this section. 8 questions required Numerical & analytical
reasoning. Out of these, 4 required calculations. The remaining 17 questions
were pure decision making questions.
The Set on the Big & Colourful
Company (which was actually more of Data Interpretation Set) on first
impression looked like a tough set. However, once you have given 5 to 7
minutes reading and analyzing the question, calculation of profits (which
was quite simple and on which 3 of the 4 questions were
based ) for all firms could be done in 3-4 minutes
and all questions could be easily answered. Quite a few students made
the mistake of leaving out this set, which was actually the most straightforward.
Out of the other 4 Analytical Reasoning questions; it would have been
preferable to attempt the single questions on Data Sufficiency and
Arrangement
Pure Decision Making:
Case I – Island of growth (2 questions): The case was almost a
page long. It talked about a developing island where corruption had become
rampant and the citizens were keeping quiet about it. Shambhu, a highly
ethical gentleman took up the cause and initially enjoyed massive support.
After a few months though, support for him seemed to decline. The questions
asked for the most unlikely reason for his initial success and the most
likely reason for the decline in support. The first question was easy; the
second was difficult as the options presented completely hypothetical reasons
that hadn’t been mentioned in the case at all.
Case II – Unethical bidding of public resources (3 questions):
This case was more than half a page long. All three questions gave further
information on the case. The first question had the media implicating the
minister and he defended himself. The question was unclear. It asked for an
appropriate inference, but it was actually asking the test takers to give
their views on what is ethical or unethical. The second question had the
minister accusing the media of being unfair. The test takers had to decide
what an independent observer’s comment would be. The third question had the
anti-corruption branch charge-sheeting some managers and ministers. The test
takers had to decide who an independent observer would find guilty. 2
questions were quite subjective and confusing.
Caselets III and IV (2 questions): These were actually 2 critical reasoning
questions that asked for the best explanations for two apparent paradoxes.
They were very easy.
Case V – What to do with an employee who is over-bearing,
unfriendly and a poor team player (3 questions): The case was half a page
long. The first question gave 5 possible decisions and asked the test taker
to rank their appropriateness. Two options here were very close. The second
question gave new information and asked which decision would be weakened by
this. This was very easy. The last question asked which of the 5 options, if
true, would weaken a particular decision. Again, two options here were very
difficult to choose between.
Caselet VI – The best performer is not taking interest in work (3
questions): This caselet was only 7 lines long. The first question asked for
the most unlikely reason for the behaviour. It was very easy. The second
question proposed 4 possible solutions and asked for the most appropriate
ones. Here the options were confusing as the ideal answer was absent. The
last question gave further information and asked for the best out of 5
decisions. This was easy.
Case VII – Inflation of grades by college students seeking
placements (4 questions): This case was less than half a page long. The first
question asked what the chairperson should do. This was easy. The second
question asked for a third party’s reaction. Here, it was difficult to choose
between 2 options. The third question gave a paragraph of new information and
asked what a fourth party should do. Here also, it was difficult to choose
between 2 options. The last question also gave a paragraph of new information
and asked what the chairperson should do now. This was easy.
SECTION C: QUANTITATIVE ABILITY
& DATA INTERPRETATION (36 questions)
The trend of this section in XAT
has been characterized with hardly component of Higher Maths in the past 2
years. The questions have been designed in such a way that they test basic
conceptual knowledge along with logical reasoning /understanding skills of
the student. This has probably done so as to encourage students with a varied
profile (especially non – engineers) to appear for the exam and also attempt
a greater no. of questions.
In comparison to last year, the
Quant Section was comparable to last year’s paper in terms of level of
difficulty with Maths questions being marginally easier but the Data
Interpretation being much tougher requiring higher reasoning and calculation
skills. Also the number of topics covered was much wider in this year’s
paper.
The breakup of the section is as
follows:
The arithmetic area was probably
easier than the other areas. The questions on Time & Distance and Time
& Work were easily doable. Questions on Statistics as well as some
questions on Numbers and Geometry were very much solvable for a student whose
quant fundamentals are strong.
Questions on Data Interpretation
were also in this section. Though the DI part appeared lengthy, it was
solvable with a bit of concentration. For instance, the Data Interpretation
set on the Football teams could have been done away with. The table on Indian
Economy (GDP, current account etc) though slightly cumbersome in calculations
was a sure shot as using approximation one could have easily arrived at
answers for 2 of the 3 questions. Also for the 3rd question (determining the
true statement) it became pretty obvious that the first 2 statements were not
necessarily true and then looking at the options with no “None of the above”
option, one could have marked option C.
The other DI set that one should
have attempted and solved is the one on Country of Ten, which though long in
reading was quite easy to analyze. Other must do questions were the ones on
Prof. Mandal, circular pool of city’s Municipal Park, Mr Mehra, Albela
Bob & Chulbul, points on the square, maximum value with pq, whole
numbers between 100 & 800, Interesting number, probability a/b, Country
of Four. For the students who are reasonably good in Quantitative Aptitude
question with finding minimum value with abc, Sara’s friends, indices
with p & q, Ram Shyam & Hari, base number system (xxx) and remainder
of polynomial function, Taxi to Wasseypur, Graph on Functions were the other
score maximizers. (Check last year exam)
Part
II
PART A - GENERAL AWARENESS
Number of Questions - 30 Time Allotted - 40 minutes (GA + Essay)
The newly introduced General
Awareness section in XAT had 30 questions with a one fourth negative marking
for each incorrect answer. A total of 40 minutes was given for both the essay
and general awareness section. Ideally one should have allotted around 20
minutes to each section.
The general awareness section had
a good mix of questions on topics ranging from business economics (national
and international), government, sports, awards and famous personalities.
There were around 10-11 questions which could have been attempted with ease
by anyone who has been regularly following the news. The remaining questions
although not difficult required an extensive and detailed knowledge of the
given topics, making high attempt in this section a bit difficult.
PART B - ESSAY WRITING
Topic - To be written in NOT more
than 200 words:
“Corruption
is the root cause of economic slowdown in India”
Corruption, if considered was an
easy and manageable topic by XAT standards. With almost every available news
channel devoting hours on the subject of corruption throughout the year 2012,
it was not a difficult topic to write an essay on. However, the factors that
makes any essay influential and grabs higher grades is the structure of
thought, right usage of language and data to support one’s stand.
The topic was easy, whether easy
or difficult to write, plays a vital role during the interviews wherein the
candidates might be asked to justify their stand which might help the
interviewer assess the thought process and depth of understanding of the
topic.
Previous year's XAT Essay topics
for your reference are as follows –
XAT 1996: There is no right way of doing a wrong thing.
XAT 1997: By the third or fourth week of the term, business
school had succeeded in afflicting me with a variation of the Stockholm
syndrome, named after the incident in which a hostage in a Stockholm bank
robbery fell in love with one of her captors.
XAT 1998: Max Weber, a German Sociologist, defined state as an
entity that has a monopoly over legal violence. India proves that the
converse is also true; if criminals cannot be punished by the law, its effect
they become the state.
XAT 1999: That is what a Television really is; it is another
eye so you can see anywhere; another part of your heart so you can feel and
care about things you never felt and cared about before; another ear to hear
strange music, the first and only International language
XAT 2000: Ships in harbour are safe; but that is not what they
are built for.
XAT 2001: Economic Growth without distributive justice can
only lead to violence.
XAT 2002: Indian Economy in the Post WTO Era
XAT 2003: To give real service, one needs to add something
that cannot be bought or measured, like sincerity and integrity.
XAT 2004: Asked at the age of 83, as to which of his project
would he choose as his master piece, Frank Lloyd Wright, the architect
answered, "The next one"
XAT 2005: More than one billion Indians: A gigantic problem or
a sea of opportunities.
XAT 2006: India has one of the largest pool of talented
manpower, but few innovations and patented products.
XAT 2007: Economic growth without environmental damage - a
mirage or a reality
XAT 2008: Gender imbalance will lead to Third world war.
XAT 2009: The Inherent vice of Capitalism is unequal sharing
of blessings and the inherent virtue of Socialism is equal sharing of misery
XAT 2010: Earth provides enough to satisfy everybody's need
but not everybody's greed
XAT 2011: A statement given and one had to make a judgment on
it.
XAT 2012: The essay topic this year comprised two statements:
One had to select one of the
statements and justify it with proper examples.
XAT 2013: Corruption is the root cause of economic slowdown in India
Strategies to crack XAT
|
India’s Leading Education Consultancy For Management/NRI Quota Admissions Guidance. M.B.A/P.G.D.M/M.M.S ADMISSION GUIDANCE IN MUMBAI, PUNE, BANGALORE TOP PRIVATE COLLEGE ADMISSION THROUGH MANAGEMENT QUOTA /NRI QUOTA & No-DoNATION
Contact-8904723394 for MBA, PGDM, MMS, PGPM, MFM, M.COM Admissions Guidance Through Management Quota, NRI Quota or No-Donation in top Private colleges or top b-school In India
NOTE:-Below Given Blog Information regarding Admission guidance to various e private colleges in India
(That does not mean that all the colleges listed below have got management seats or Any authorization with us)
Thursday, 6 November 2014
XAT 2015 important dates | XAT 2015 important Exam
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment